X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C82A15.8A3C195C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:02:18 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C82A15.8A3C195C"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Volume hard limits 
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:01:24 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02176332@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Volume hard limits 
Thread-Index: AcgnH+9bu3DDTVGNT1Cz8nWwU/fl0QBisIdQAFquIM0=
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E028B4BE5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
From: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
To: "May Ma" <may.ma@onstor.com>,
	"Brian DeForest" <brian.deforest@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Design Review" <dl-designreview@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C82A15.8A3C195C
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can we also just drop the lvol create back-door? I don't recall a =
use-case where we would really need that.


-----Original Message-----
From: May Ma
Sent: Fri 11/16/2007 4:20 PM
To: Brian DeForest; dl-Design Review
Subject: RE: Volume hard limits=20
=20
Questions:

1) Will "volume modify" command at 90 volumes, and "volume delete" =
command at 91 volumes give warning message for 90% limit?=20

2) Is an autosupport email going to send out besides elog warning =
message for 90% volume size or 90% volume limit?

3) If user has hardquota set to >32 TB before upgrade, would the number =
get changed to 32 TB after upgrade?  What about minautogrow set to >32 =
TB before upgrade?



Thanks
May.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian DeForest=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:39 PM
To: dl-Design Review
Subject: Volume hard limits=20

The enforcement of volume hard limits in R98 is documented here:

	\\mightydog\Software\VolumeManager\VolumeHardLimits02.doc

Any/all feedback is welcome.  There are no plans to hold a review =
meeting.

Brian


------_=_NextPart_001_01C82A15.8A3C195C
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: Volume hard limits </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Can we also just drop the lvol create back-door? I =
don't recall a use-case where we would really need that.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: May Ma<BR>
Sent: Fri 11/16/2007 4:20 PM<BR>
To: Brian DeForest; dl-Design Review<BR>
Subject: RE: Volume hard limits<BR>
<BR>
Questions:<BR>
<BR>
1) Will &quot;volume modify&quot; command at 90 volumes, and =
&quot;volume delete&quot; command at 91 volumes give warning message for =
90% limit?<BR>
<BR>
2) Is an autosupport email going to send out besides elog warning =
message for 90% volume size or 90% volume limit?<BR>
<BR>
3) If user has hardquota set to &gt;32 TB before upgrade, would the =
number get changed to 32 TB after upgrade?&nbsp; What about minautogrow =
set to &gt;32 TB before upgrade?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Thanks<BR>
May.<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Brian DeForest<BR>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:39 PM<BR>
To: dl-Design Review<BR>
Subject: Volume hard limits<BR>
<BR>
The enforcement of volume hard limits in R98 is documented here:<BR>
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
\\mightydog\Software\VolumeManager\VolumeHardLimits02.doc<BR>
<BR>
Any/all feedback is welcome.&nbsp; There are no plans to hold a review =
meeting.<BR>
<BR>
Brian<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C82A15.8A3C195C--
